And yesterday I
saw you kissing tiny flowers,
But all that
lives is born to die
And so I say to
you that nothing really matters,
And all you do is
stand and cry
Led Zeppelin ‘That’s
the way’
‘Live every day
as though it will be your last,’
always struck me as an absurd piece of advice. If today was your last day of life
would you bother going to work? Pay the mortgage or the gas bill? Clean the
house? Feed the kids? Change your underpants? Or would you spend the day
getting drunk, having sex, revenging yourself on your enemies (without fear of
the consequences) or blubbing inconsolably about your imminent demise? All that
'live for the moment' stuff is just nonsense - if we took it seriously we would
find ourselves jobless, divorced and broke in a matter of days. If everybody
lived for the moment civilisation would fall down around our ears within a week.
The only way we, humanity, can bring
stability and predictability to our world is by contriving to ignore the fact
that we are going to die and carrying on as though we are going to live, if not
for ever, then at least for a century or two. American psychologists Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon
Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski are fascinated by the human ability to stare death
in the face and simply not see it, though they seem, on the whole, to think
that our capacity to ignore our inevitable demise is rather a bad thing and
something we should strive to get over.
The
three psychologists shared a common passion for Ernest Becker the American
social anthropologist who, when dying of colon cancer, had observed that most
other people seemed blithely unaware that one day their precarious existence
would be snuffed out by death. He theorised that society, civilisation, is an
elaborate defence mechanism to shield us from the devastating knowledge that we
are mortal. Only by pretending that we live forever are we able to get up in
the morning and face the day. Becker’s views were not so different the Greek
philosopher Epicurus who had come to similar conclusions two thousand years
ago, so there is nothing new in these ideas. Greenberg, Solomon and Pyszczynski
have spent their careers building on the notions of Epicurus and Becker and
have come up with a scientifically testable hypothesis they call ‘Terror
Management Theory’ which states the basic psychological conflict between our
instinct for self preservation and our knowledge of the inevitability of death
results in a state of terror which is then managed by embracing cultural values
that provide life with enduring meaning and value. The sudden revelation that ‘all that lives is
born to die’ threatened our burgeoning consciousness and even the survival of
the species:
The awareness of
death arose as a byproduct of early humans' burgeoning self-awareness, and it
would have undermined consciousness as a viable form of mental
organization—hurling our terrified and demoralized ancestors into the
psychological abyss and onto the evolutionary scrap heap of extinct lifeforms—
in the absence of simultaneous adaptations to transcend death. But our ancestors
ingeniously conspired to “Just Say No” to reality by creating a supernatural
universe that afforded a sense of control over life and death, enabling them to
bound over the “yawning chasm” and cross the cognitive Rubicon that triggered
humankind’s evolutionary explosion.
Consciousness of the ephemerality of human existence came early to the species - Neandertal's bury their dead |
Having
posited an awareness of death as an early feature of developing human
consciousness the authors discuss how social and cultural norms protect us from
the full implications of that knowledge. They cite research which shows that
judges were prompted to set a bail figure nine times higher for an alleged prostitute
after being made to think about their own deaths. Even subtle reminders about death make us more
likely to be patriotic – in one study Germans interviewed in front of a shop
showed no particular preference for things German, but those interviewed in front
of a cemetery preferred German food, German cars, and even German holidays to
foreign alternatives. As well as making us more judgemental towards those who
do not share our values and more patriotic the authors argue that “over the course of human history, the
terror of death has guided the development of art, religion, language,
economics and science. It raised the pyramids in Egypt and razed the Twin
Towers in New York.”
This
is an interesting and readable book. I don’t have any argument with the
contention that our mortality underpins every aspect of our existence or dispute
that humans are very good at ignoring the prospect of their own demise. It also
seems self evident that the fear of death plays a significant part in religion
and that art, at least for the artist, represents an opportunity for a type of
ersatz immortality if their work proves popular enough. All this seems self
evident and not particularly contentious. The authors go much further than this
though and see the repressed fear of death as being the driving force behind
much of our psychology and our social and cultural life. Death looms as large
in their view of human motivation as sex does to orthodox Freudians, and for
the same reasons is, in the final analysis, not completely convincing.
No comments:
Post a Comment