The Burdett Coutts Memorial sundial with St Pancras Hospital (the old workhouse) in the background |
The Baroness Burdett
Coutts and the St. Pancras-gardens. — The special committee for the laying-out
of the old St. Pancras and St. Giles-in-the- fields burying grounds as gardens
have reported to the vestry that the Baroness Burdett Coutts had evinced her great
interest by erecting a marble monument to preserve the head stone originally standing
over the grave of John Walker, author of ‘Walker's Pronouncing Dictionary’; also
that they had approved of a very handsome design for a memorial sundial to be
erected by her ladyship to the memory of the illustrious dead lying in the
grounds, at a cost probably exceeding £3,000. The committee reported further
that the sum of £1,000, presented by the baroness, had been expended in the
erection of a green- house, in accordance with the suggestion of her ladyship.
The report was approved on the motion of Mr Westacott, chairman of the committee.
Morning
Post - Friday 21 December 1877
In
1866 when the vestries of St Pancras and St Giles sold portions of their burial
ground to the Midland Railway Company it caused a huge controversy (see
‘Horrible Desecration of the Dead at St Pancras’). Eight years, in 1874, the
controversy flared up again when the Railway Company approached the St Pancras
vestry and enquired if they were willing to sell the reminder of the cemetery. The
resulting public outcry was so great that the vestries of St Pancras and St
Giles decided not to proceed with the sale but instead to turn the land into a
public garden. They even voted on spending £1000 of the vestry’s own money to
lay out the grounds. But when it was decided that to properly enclose the
proposed garden some residential property adjoining the burial grounds consisting
of 4 houses and 5 cottages belonging to the St Giles vestry needed to be
included in the plans the vicar of St Giles withdrew the vestry’s permission; he
felt that the property was worth at least £5000 but the committee was only
proposing to pay a £1500 in compensation. When the matter ended up in the courts the
Midland Railway Company spotted a chance to get its bid for the burial ground
back onto the negotiating table and also started proceedings questioning the
legality of the decision taken to open a public garden. The Railway Company
used its political influence to get the Government to propose a Midland Bill,
granting the company use of the land. At a fraught meeting of the ratepayers of
the two vestries, supporters and detractors of the bill argued ferociously
about what should happen to the remainder of the burial ground. Many resident
ratepayers were in favour of selling to the railway company because the grounds
would no longer be their financial responsibility. Others, many with family
members buried in the churchyard, demanded that the desecration of the dead at
the hands of the railway company stop. The Government finally settled the
question by convening a public enquiry chaired by Philip Holland, Medical
Inspector of Burials at the Home Office. After duly hearing the evidence
Holland determined in favour of the public garden.
One
of those who took a fervent interest in the future of the disused burial
grounds was the philanthropist Baroness Burdett Coutts who felt that as they
were “no longer used for their original purpose, they have lost the protection
of the living, without securing the sanctity that should protect the dead.” In
a letter she later wrote to the vestry of St Pancras she goes into some detail
about her motivation for involving herself in the preservation of London’s old
burial grounds, explaining that “the feelings and reflections which even an unnamed
tombstone is calculated to excite …. would be lost if the graves of the dead
were obliterated from the land, for a number of stones huddled together,
possibly as carefully as circumstances permitted, cannot convey the same
feelings as does a grave, even to the least reflective mind. The mere fact of
closing over and stamping out of remembrance the dead renders them lifeless
indeed and denies to their memory those tender and salutary lessons so often
given in the quiet of ' God's acres.'” The Baroness was determined that the
garden should be a memorial to the dead interred there and that it should
preserve the principal tombstones and key features of the burial ground. She
funded works to conserve headstones and to landscape the gardens but her most
lasting contribution to the project was the enormous sundial dedicated to the
memory of the illustrious dead placed at the heart of the garden.
The
sundial was designed by the architect George Highton of Elm Park, Brixton and
built by Messrs H. Daniel & Co. of Highgate. Cast iron railings enclose.
According to Building News of 07
November 1877 “the superstructure, which
is in the Early Decorated style, consists mainly of Portland stone with four marble
tablets, and clustered granite columns at the angles. The tablets are
surmounted with reliefs representing St. Pancras and St. Giles, also Night and
Morning, by Signer Fucigna. On the tablet under the dial are inscribed the
Beatitudes…. The terraces, which are constructed to form flower-beds, are
mainly of red Mansfield stone, worked at the quarries. The panels of the two
upper terrace tiers contain flowers — with butterflies as the emblem of
immortality — in mosaics; the top one has panels in relief, representing the
four seasons, by Messrs. Wills, of Euston-road. The bottom tier panels are also
in mosaics. The whole of the mosaics have been executed by Messrs. Simpson and
Sons, of St. Martin’s-lane. The whole is in-closed by kerb and iron railing and
gates; the latter by the St. Pancras Iron Works Company.” Standing at the
corners of the enclosure are Portland stone statues, two dogs and two lions. The
four faces of the central shaft contain panels listing the names of the
illustrious dead who were interred in the two old burial grounds. There are
some omissions; William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, quite possibly the two
most famous people buried here do not rate a mention, almost certainly because
they were radicals and freethinkers. The panel of the south west side, facing
the entrance to the gardens, contains a lengthy verse dedication which starts:
Here
in Christ’s acre where this dial stands,
With
pious care and borne by reverent hands,
Lone
wanderers garnered in from east and west
Among
the home-loved lie in solemn rest;
Severed
in life by lineage, race, faith, clime
They
bide alike the last soft stroke of time
The
sundial is in the gable above this panel with an inscription which reads TEMPUS
EDAX RERUM; time devours all things. The other panels list the eminent dead
whose graves had been disturbed by the railway company, 86 names in total
including Sir John Soane, Baroness Burdett Coutts’ favourite sculptor John
Flaxman, Pasquale Paoli the liberator of Corsica, Sidly Effendi the Turkish
Ambassador, the crossdressing swordsman the Chevalier D’Eon, John Walker author
of the Pronouncing Dictionary, and Tiberius Cavallo the Italian natural
philosopher.
Contemporary illustration of the memorial from the 'Building News' of 7 November 1877 |
Controversies
over the routing of train lines through cemeteries did not end in the era of
Victorian railway expansion. The issue has flared up again in the 21st century because
of the Channel Tunnel rail link, Crossrail, HS1 and HS2. Both HS projects as
well as the Channel Tunnel rail link have affected the disused burial grounds
lying just to the north of King Cross, St Pancras and Euston stations. In 2002 the
Channel Tunnel rail link cut through land containing, according to English
Heritage, around 4000 graves from the Old St Pancras burial ground, the bodies
were to be reinterred in a mass grave in the new St Pancras cemetery in Finchley.
Archaeologists were given a relatively short
period of time to examine the graves and remove what humans remains were left
and protested vociferously when they were unceremoniously kicked off site when
they overran their allotted time. They accused the rail company of coming in
with bulldozers to dig up old graves. Amongst the archaeologists finds were the
Archbishop of Narbonne’s false teeth. This indignity had nothing to do with the
2012 Archbishops Council petition to parliament against the HS2 bill to include
a cause allowing for the dignified removal of human remains from cemeteries
lying on the route of the new line. In London St James’ Gardens, the site of
the former disused burial ground of St James in Piccadilly, lie directly on the
new route and was scheduled to be cleared. The old burial ground lies in St Pancras
Parish and the latest incumbent, the Reverend Anne Stevens, who feels she still
has a duty to care for the souls of the 35,000 people she believes are buried
there, led a protest against the proposals in November 2015. All to no avail, the
old burial ground was cleared by the railway company in the months that
followed.
No comments:
Post a Comment