Friend of China, Enemy of Oppression; Augustus Frederick Lindley (1840-1871) Kensal Green Cemetery

The epitaph on the grave of Augustus Frederick Lindley, in Kensal Green Cemetery, notes that he was a friend of China and an enemy of oppression. Although Lindley died in March 1873, the headstone is relatively modern, a rough-hewn pink granite slab bearing the signature of local stonemasons J.S. Farley but paid for by a research association of Beijing based academic historians, and unveiled in August 1981, by a representative of the People’s Republic of China. The inscription, in English and Mandarin, reads:

Augustus
Frederick
Lindley
3. February 1830
29 March 1873
Friend of China
Enemy of Oppression

献给呤唎
中国人民之友
北京太平天国历史研究会
一九八一年八月

[Dedicated to Lindley
A friend of the Chinese people
Beijing Taiping Rebellion History Research Association
August 1981] 

The Chinese may not have forgotten Lindley but the British, who barely deigned to notice him when he was alive, have let him slip into complete obscurity since his death. Although he had aristocratic and establishment connections in his background, he was illegitimate, almost certainly raised in hardship, if not complete poverty, and perhaps unsurprisingly became something of an outsider in adulthood. In mid nineteenth century England he was that very rare thing, an anti-imperialist. 

He died young, he was only 33, at his home in Upper Vernon Street, (now Prideaux Place), just off Percy Circus in Clerkenwell. He spent significant amounts of his short adult life in China and South Africa and already published 3 book, with a fourth, 'Adamantia: the truth about the South African diamond fields', already printed and about to be dispatched to bookshops. He married, for the second time, in September 1872 and left an estate worth less than £600 to console his grieving widow for a marriage that lasted a mere six months.  Although only Lindley's name is on the memorial he is not buried alone. In fact, it is not really his grave. The plot was originally purchased five years earlier by his sister Lucy and her husband, the reverend William Elisha Faulkner, to bury their young son Frederick, who had died, according to the cemetery's burial records, at the age of two years and seven months in 1868. The following year, the Faulkner's had the grave reopened again, this time to receive the body of their daughter Alice who had died in infancy. Fifteen years later, in 1891, Lindley's 78-year-old mother, Lucy Garrett was also buried there. It is difficult to believe that the Faulkner's would not have raised a headstone to commemorate their two children and Lucy's brother and mother. But if there ever was a headstone, it has long gone, and been replaced by the modern marker, which reflects the interests of the Chinese historians and only remembers Lindley and not his family.   

The natural harbour at Whampoa

Lindley was a prolific author of journalism and books based on his own experiences, but he was extremely reticent about revealing anything to do with his own background. In particular his early life has hitherto been a complete mystery and in his voluminous writings he says nothing about his origins or family. We know that at 13 he became an apprentice in the merchant navy, being indentured to John Somerville of Seaton Sluice on the 19th May 1853, for service on SS Colonist, registered at Sunderland. In 1857, when he was 17, he qualified and was registered as a second mate in the merchant service.  In 1859 he arrived in Hong Kong on the S.S. Emeu. Within a year he had abandoned his career in the merchant navy and opted for a life of freebooting adventure, taking a position on a trading steamer smuggling specie to the Taiping rebels in Shanghai.  and becoming involved with Marie, who was, says Lindley “the daughter of a rich Macanese, who was principal owner of one of the Whampoa docks, and was also Portuguese consul at that port. Her mother was dead, and her father had determined to compel her to marry a wealthy Chilianian half-caste; in fact, everything was arranged for the marriage to take place in ten days time. She hated the fellow, in spite of his dollars, which, it appeared, was her father's idol, and was resolved to suffer anything rather than submit.” Lindley saved her from her arranged marriage, with no ulterior motive of course, but gradually found himself succumbing to the lovely Marie, who “could scarcely number sixteen summers,” (Lindley was himself only 19 at the time) and even though she was “rather darker than the generality of Macao women: her complexion was a beautifully clear deep olive, the skin delicately soft.” Listing her physical charms, Lindley struggles to rise above cliché; her hair is as “dark as the raven's wing”, her nose “Grecian”, her “richly coloured” mouth “studded with teeth of pearly whiteness” and her figure “petite” and “lithe”. Her behaviour too, in Lindley’s description, is as formulaic as her appearance, being one of “those warm, impassioned temperaments of the East” to whom “love becomes as necessary as life itself”. Jealousy reduces her to “a fiery little piece of impetuosity”, and when Lindley deliberately provokes the green-eyed monster, she tries to stab him with a stiletto (alas she does not succeed). Clearly Marie adored him and after rescuing her not once, but twice, from the clutches of the dastardly ‘Chillinian’ (Lindley presumably meant ‘Chilean’) Manoel Ramon, and then subjecting her to a long, enforced separation, when he has to fulfil his duties as a naval commander for the rebels, Lindley marries her in the rebel capital Nanking, in a “quiet solemnization, with only a few friends present.”

Marie, Lindley's first wife

Lindley had no luck with matrimony, his first marriage was nearly as brief as his second. Rather recklessly he takes Marie with him on a naval expedition in the middle of the rebellion and the couple find themselves in the middle of a night attack by imperial naval forces. Outnumbered and outgunned Lindley gives the order to abandon their large fighting junk and board a smaller, faster lorcha, a boat with a western style hull and junk sails and rigging. After successfully transferring to the lorcha “I was just turning to my dear wife to hurry her below,” Lindley writes, “when a volley of musketry was poured in by the troops on board the attacking vessels. I saw my faithful friend and companion, L--, fall to the deck, but almost at the same moment, struck by a spent ball, I became senseless. I know not what period may have elapsed, but when at length I was restored to consciousness, it was but to realize the exquisite bitterness of my loss. Close to where my best and long-proved friend had fallen, lay the lifeless form of my well-loved wife, pierced by a flight of bullets.”  You would imagine that losing your spouse under such circumstances would be a traumatising event but Victorian men were made of sterner stuff, no further mention is made of Marie and Lindley carries on with his adventures as though nothing had happened. It is hard to believe that anyone, even a 19th century man. could be quite so emotionally stifled. It makes me wonder whether Marie really existed or whether she was just a figment of Lindley’s imagination.

Lindley’s short and tragic relationship with Marie is just a sub plot in his book, ‘Ti-Ping Tien-Kwoh: The History of the Ti-Ping Revolution' (1866). the work for which he is still remembered and held in such high esteem by Chinese historians of the Taiping Revolution.  The rebellion of the Heavenly Kingdom of Taiping was probably the bloodiest civil war ever seen with estimates of the dead ranging between 20 and30 million. Lindley took the side of the Taiping rebels against the imperial Qing dynasty, putting him at odds with most eminent Victorian, Major-General Charles George Gordon, of Khartoum fame, who was leading a force of imperial troops and helping to secure the eventual victory of the Emperor. In his book Lindley is very critical of the role of the British in China and in particular of General Gordon (Gordon is mentioned 97 times in the book, poor Marie, that fiery little piece of impetuosity, just 48). Although he almost certainly exaggerated both his role and his importance in the rebellion it seems certain that Lindley did became a naval commander for the rebels and took part in the Battle of Jofoolzo in 1863, the battle during which he claims Marie was killed. Lindley retuned to London in 1863 where he started to write and publish numerous books, starting with his book on the Taiping Rebellion in 1866 and followed by ‘The Log of the Fortuna: a cruise in Chinese Waters’. In 1868 he travelled to South Africa intending to prospect for gold in the Transvaal. No gold was discovered but he again found himself in an imperial dispute, this time between the British and the Boer's Orange Free State over diamond mines in Griqualand. Once back in England Lindley wrote two books 'After Ophir, or, A Search For the South African Gold Fields' and 'Adamantia: the truth about the South African diamond fields', which took the side of the Boers. He married Helen Amy Butler in September 1872 but was dead just over 6 months later. 

We know very little about Lindley’s grandfather, Captain William Lindley of the Westmorland militia, other than he was born in 1770 and made a very good marriage, in Ireland, with Harriet Murray in 1790. William’s background was obscure but Harriet’s lineage was aristocratic; her maternal grandfather was the 3rd Earl of Dunmore and her paternal great grandfather the 1st Duke of Atholl. William and Harriet had four children, three boys one girl, but their marriage foundered when William was unfaithful and the proud Harriet refused to countenance his adultery. Rather unusually for the time, and almost certainly with the backing of her powerful family, she sued her husband for divorce whilst she was living in Scotland. It appears that the couple were separated at the time, with William living in Westmorland in pursuit of a position in the county militia but the writ of divorce was served on him whilst he was visiting Scotland. He engaged a solicitor who submitted a defence challenging the relevancy of the divorce proceedings but, tellingly, not disputing the allegation of adultery itself. The defence was dismissed by the Commissaries of Edinburgh and Harriet’s ‘oath of calumny’ accepted. She received her divorce. William made four attempts to get the court to reverse the decision, all unsuccessful. Harriet remarried a year later but William disappears from the records. 

Lindley's certificate of competency, Second Mate, awarded when he was 17. 

William and Harriet’s eldest son, Augustus Frederick Lindley, was born 1796. He is the father of our Lindley. There were early indications that bad blood ran in the family when Lindley’s uncle Drummond, William and Harriet’s second son, was transported to Australia at the age of 22. Drummond’s crime was stealing a silver purse containing a £1 note from Mary Ellison, a prostitute. Drummond’s defence was that she had stolen his pocketbook and the theft of her purse was retaliation. Despite invoking his good education and aristocratic lineage in a later plea for clemency, the 7-year sentence of transportation was not commuted and Drummond never returned to England. The young Augustus meanwhile was doing his best to show that he was a chip off the old block. Just like his father he managed to hook himself a scion of the aristocracy for a wife; he was 33 when in 1830 he married the 43-year-old spinster Mary Muray, whose father was Alexander Murray, 7th Lord Elibank, and mother Mary Montolieu, the daughter of the Baron de St Hypolite. Augustus was clearly preying on the 43-year-old virgin for either her connections or her money, probably both as the marriage was childless and how Augustus earned a living has never been very clear. He was an officer in the 2nd Royal Lanarkshire Militia but this was either unpaid or a not very lucrative position. He later claimed to have been resident in Jamaica for many years, doing what we do not know, and also said that he had been “for may years confidential clerk to mixed British and foreign commission office.” He didn’t always pay his bills on time; in 1839 a solicitor pursued his debt to a wine merchant through the sheriff’s court and around the same time an Edinburgh grocer was also chasing him through the courts for an outstanding account. 

Like his father Augustus also had an eye for the ladies and in the late 1830’s he met Lucy Richardson, a young woman in her early twenties, a music teacher and later organist at St Botolphs Aldersgate. Their son, named after his father, was born in 1840 and baptised at St Georges Hanover Square. In the 1841 census Lucy has changed her surname to Lindley, without having married Augustus senior, and is living in Cheyne Row, Chelsea with her one-year-old son. We know that the relationship with Augustus continued because Lucy was pregnant again and later in the year gave birth to a daughter, Lucy Augusta Lindley. In the 1851 census Lucy and the 11-year-old Augustus are living in Crescent Place, St Pancras, a street that has either been renamed or has disappeared but must have been in the area of Marchmont Street on the south side of Euston Road, as in the census returns it falls between Margaret Row and Burton Street, which are both in the immediate vicinity. Lucy’s profession is now given as an organist/pianist but her 10-year-old daughter is not listed as living with her. Instead of being with her mother she is a boarder in the rather large household of Eliza Puxon, a Bacon Dryer, of Glasshouse Yard in the parish of St Botolph’s, Aldersgate. Was Eliza Puxon known to Lucy Lindley through the church where Lucy was the organist? At the next census in 1861 Lucy Augusta was back living with her mother but not for long; on the 21st August she married William Elisha Faulkner, then a clerk but later a clergyman, at St John the Baptist in Clerkenwell. Three years after her daughter Lucy Lindley, still using the surname of the father of her two children but now calling herself a widow, married Mark Brown Garrett, a surgeon and apothecary, at St Marks, Myddleton Square in Islington. Just a few months before the marriage Garrett was brought before the Police magistrate at Thames Police Court for assaulting Robert Roche, the courts gaoler.  According to the report in the Sun (London) of Saturday 26 January 1861, Garrett had struck Roche with his fist in the armpit in a quarrel over some blank forms for outdoor relief that the doctor wanted to collect from the magistrates. In court Roche made it clear that he and Garrett had known each other for some time and that he thought Garrett had a grudge against him for refusing to release Garrett from gaol 16 years earlier. Inspector Beare of K Division of the Metropolitan Police backed up Roche’s evidence and added that Garrett had called him a swindler and a scoundrel. When the magistrate asked if Garrett also had an aversion to Beare for any reason, Beare said that he did, because he had locked him up in Poplar Police Station for assaulting a toll collector. Garrett was clearly a man with a short temper, hopefully he did not lose it too often with his wife. Garrett died at the age of 59 in 1871 and Lucy shortly afterwards moved into the Royal Medical Benevolent College in Epsom where she lived as aa charitable pensioner until her death in 1891.    

And what happened to Augustus Frederick Lindley senior? His wife Mary died in October 1854, living just long enough to possibly hear of her husband fathering another son with a woman called Mary Ovenstone, though the paternity case in the Sheriff Court in Hamilton, Lanarkshire, wasn’t brought against him until 1857. Porr Mary would also have known about the sentence of 9 months hard labour her husband had received in 1851 for swindling £50 from a clergyman’s widow. Even worse, the fraud had arisen as a revenge on the widow for stopping Augustus from seeing her daughter. The case was reported widely in the newspapers; this is from the British Army Despatch of 31 October 1851:

EXTRAORDINARY CASE OF OBTAINING MONEY BY FALSE PRETENCES. At the Somerset Sessions, Augustus Frederick Lindley, a person apparently between 50 and 6O years of age, was charged with obtaining, by false pretences, the sum of £50. from Mrs. Jane Williams. It appeared that the prosecutrix, who was the widow of a clergyman, resided at Orient Villa, Taunton, and her family consisted of a daughter and servant. The defendant had also resided for some time in that town. He had married a person of some position in society, but his own status was not very certain, though he was believed to be a gentleman by birth and education. After some time he made the acquaintance of prosecutrix's daughter, and the daughter introduced him to prosecutrix, when a close intimacy sprang up. He was constantly visiting the house. In the course of the present spring or summer, the attention of Mrs. Williams was drawn to the circumstance that defendant's attentions to her daughter were too serious and marked for a married person. Of course she felt anxious about the matter, and accordingly she wrote him a letter, and afterwards verbally told him that she wished the acquaintance to be discontinued. During the acquaintance, Mr. Lindley appeared to have acquired a most extraordinary influence over the daughter, and their intimacy still continued against the wish of her mother. The breaking off, however, of the acquaintance gave rise to feelings of revenge, and for the purpose of gratifying them he bethought himself of an ingenious expedient. It appeared that Mrs. Williams, not living in any style of pretension, had some articles of plate, none of which bore armorial bearings of herself or family; but, some years ago, at a sale, she purchased a teapot, which bore the crest of somebody else; and for this she was liable to duty. Mrs. Williams had not returned this in her schedule, and defendant thought it a good opportunity of venting his ill will by bringing her in for the serious penalties which the law renders persons liable to for making incorrect returns. The defendant gave information to the Board of Inland Revenue that the prosecutrix had made herself liable to penalties for the evasion of the duty. On receiving a communication from the Inland Revenue office, Mrs. Williams became frightened and sent for the prisoner to consult him. He informed her that she was liable to £150. to be paid to the commissioners, and £150, to be paid into his own pocket. He also told her that he would be liable to a penalty of £50 for giving false information if he did not proceed with the matter, and he asked for this £50 to send to the commissioners, and clear himself from the liability. She gave him the £50. On making known the circumstance to her friends, they advised her to apply to him for the £50, and, as he refused to give it up, the present proceedings were instituted. The chairman, in a most impressive address to the prisoner, concluded by stating that "the sentence of the Court was, that he be confined and kept to - hard labour in Wilton Gaol for nine calendar months." The prisoner, who seemed deeply to feel his situation, then left the dock, and was shortly afterwards removed in a fly to Wilton House of Correction.

It appears that Augustus did not serve his full sentence; criminal records show that he made a request for clemency from the Queen because of his ill health and that after medical investigation he was released early.  Neither his ill health nor his criminal record stopped his promotion to Captain in the Royal Lanarkshire Militia in 1855. Shortly afterwards he seems to have moved to Jersey where he died on the 9th December 1857 and was buried in the  Mont à L'Abbé Old Cemetery.

Whatever happened to the heroes? Monuments to the war dead in St Paul's Cathedral

Like Westminster Abbey, St Paul’s Cathedral is not a place you pop into casually. Unless you have an invitation to a Royal Wedding, are attending a memorial service for a recently departed member of the great and the good or you can convince one of the security staff that you actually want to go in and worship, then the cost of entry is £26. The Church of England may be the 8^th biggest landowner in the country (200,000 acres) but they have 16,000 churches, 43 cathedrals and 2 archbishops to look after and, quite frankly, not enough comes from the rents and the Sunday collection boxes to meet the cost of maintaining their portfolio of historic buildings. So when the number of people wanting to see an historic cathedral reaches critical mass, barricades and ticket booths appear and the tourists have to pay a steep fee to gain entry.  Charges are nothing new; St Paul’s has been charging for admission since 1709, though it only cost two (old) pence to get in at that time. The last time I was at St Paul’s must have been in the late nineties when it cost about a fiver to get in.

I was surprised by the number of funerary memorials there were in the Cathedral. I simply did not remember there being so many. Many of them, the impressive ones, date from the early 19^th Century and commemorate the high-ranking army and navy officers who died in the Napoleonic wars. Composed in the heroic, neoclassical mode, they feature life-size, or larger than life-size, figures, many of them, male and female, semi naked, bare breasted, and with superb musculature, representing the final moments of the deceased’s life, sometimes on death beds, sometimes on the battle field.  The deceased die in the arms of their comrades or are received by gloriously Valkyrie-like Angels; these memorials are positively pagan, ‘pro patria mori’ celebrations of death in combat.   

One of the most eye catching is the monument to Vice Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood, the first Baron Collingwood. A semi naked Collingwood, eyes closed, lies on a funeral barge, gripping his sword, supported over by an angel in a diaphanous robe. A river god, old father Thames perhaps, disports in the water by the barge with two naked putti clambering over him. The memorial was raised by public subscription and was made by Richard Westmacott the second, best known for his statue of Achilles in Hyde Park (in commemoration of the Duke of Wellington) and the pediment on the façade of the British Museum. Collingwood was born in 1748 in Newcastle to a landowning family who had lost most of their estates when Collingwood’s great grandfather had become a Jacobite and took part in the 1715 uprising to put the Old Pretender on the British throne (for which crime he was eventually hanged at Liverpool). Collingwood joined the Royal Navy at the age of 12 and rose through the ranks from midshipman to lieutenant to captain to rear admiral, admiral and finally commander in chief of the Mediterranean fleet following Nelson’s death. He fought in the American and French Revolutionary Wars and was present at many of the most famous naval engagements of the time including Cape St Vincent and Trafalgar.  Despite his many opportunities to die in battle, he actually succumbed to cancer in 1810. In agonising pain and knowing that he was seriously ill and almost certainly dying, when his pet dog Bounce fell overboard and drowned in late 1809, the dispirited Collingwood requested to be relieved of his command in late 1809. The Naval authorities prevaricated and initially refused his request. By February 1810 Collingwood could no longer walk and the Naval authorities had to finally recognise that their supreme field commander was about to die. He was given permission to return home but died of cancer on board HMS Ville de Paris, off Port Mahon in Menorca, as he sailed for England. His body was returned to England and taken by barge up the Thames to Greenwich Hospital before finally being interred beside his former commander, Lord Nelson in the crypt of the cathedral.

Down in the crypt, close by Nelson’s tomb (Nelson’s second-hand black marble sarcophagus was originally made for Cardinal Wolsey, but the Cardinal managed to disgrace himself with Henry VIII and was buried in an unmarked grave in Leicester Abbey. George III thought it would make a suitable tomb for Nelson) is the memorial for Admiral George Brydges Rodney, 1st Baron Rodney, who died in retirement in 1792. His memorial was originally upstairs in the nave of the cathedral but at some point, he was moved downstairs, upstairs being reserved for more illustrious deaths, such as that of Lieutenant-General Sir Ralph Abercromby who died in 1801. The monument is another of Richard Westmacott’s masterpieces and shows a wounded Abercromby being lifted from his horse and is flanked by two superb sphinxes. Abercromby was commanding the British forces against the French at the Battle of Alexandria in 1801 when he was struck in the thigh by a musket ball. Badly wounded, he refused to relinquish command or accept medical attention until the battle had been won. He was cheered from the battle field by his troops but his surgeons were unable to remove the musket ball from his leg. Infection set in and he died seven days later and was buried at Fort St Elmo in Valletta, Malta. 

Close by Abercromby’s memorial is the monument to Sir John Moore, his second in command at the Battle of Alexandria. The monument, by John Bacon the younger, shows Moore expiring on the battlefield at A Coruña in 1809, after being "struck in his left breast and shoulder by a cannon shot, which broke his ribs, his arm, lacerated his shoulder and the whole of his left side and lungs." He did not die immediately but remained conscious throughout the remainder of the battle. He told his aide-de-camp, Colonel Paul Anderson "You know, I always wished to die this way, I hope the people of England will be satisfied! I hope my country will do me justice!" His final words were to Charles Banks Stanhope, "Remember me to your sister, Stanhope." He was buried in his military cloak on the ramparts of  A Coruña and later a fine tomb chest was erected in his honour by the leader of the Spanish forces. 

The memorial to Captain George Blagdon Westcott of the Majestic is by Thomas Banks and shows the soul of Westcott in a classical tunic being received by an angel on the deck of his ship. Westcott died at the Battle of the Nile in 1798. The Majestic collided with the French ship Heureux and became entangled in her rigging. Westcott was hit by a musket ball in the throat and killed. Westcott was from Honiton in Devon and was of rather humble origins, his father was a baker. Nelson visited Honiton in 1801 and visited Westcott’s mother, writing to Lady Hamilton “Captain Westcott's mother – poor thing, except from the bounty of government and Lloyd's, in very low circumstances. The brother is a tailor, but had they been chimney-sweepers it was my duty to show them respect.” Also by Thomas Banks is what was the first war memorial raised in St Paul’s, to Captain Richard Rundle Burges of HMS Ardent who died at the Battle of Camperdown in October 1797. Banks shows a near naked Burgess, his modesty preserved by a strategically placed piece of cloth tossed over his shoulder and ending just above his crotch, being received by a bare breasted angel. At the Battle of Camperdown Burges’ ship had singlehandedly engaged the much bigger Dutch flagship, Vrijheid, in what became the single bloodiest combat of the battle. Over a hundred men died on the Ardent, including Burges who was sliced in half by chain shot within the first ten minutes of the engagement.  

Tempus fugit; Sally Mann 'What Remains' (Bulfinch Press, 2003, out of print) & 'Hold Still; A Memoir with Photographs' (Penguin Modern Classics, 2024 £14.99)

As for me, I see both the beauty and the dark side of the things; the loveliness of cornfields and full sails, but the ruin as well. And I see them at the same time, at once ecstatic at the beauty of things, and chary of that ecstasy. The Japanese have a phrase for this dual perception: mono no aware. It means "beauty tinged with sadness," for there cannot be any real beauty without the indolic whiff of decay. For me, living is the same thing as dying, and loving is the same thing as losing, and this does not make me a madwoman; I believe it can make me better at living, and better at loving, and, just possibly, better at seeing.

Sally Mann, ‘Hold Still; A Memoir with Photographs.' 

For a visual artist straddling the 20^th and 21^st centuries, photographer Sally Mann is remarkably rooted in her native soil. Born in Lexington, Virginia, in 1951, she has lived in Rockridge County for all her life apart from a spell at school in Vermont when she was a teenager. She married Larry Mann in 1970 and the couple raised their three children in the house they built on a farm bought on impulse by Sally’s medical practitioner father in the late 1950’s. Her work is rooted in history, in place, in family, in community but is not constrained in any way by the idyllic surroundings of the Shenandoah valley because her themes are the eternal verities, life and death, light and darkness, love, loss, memory and the unremitting flight of time.  She acquired public notoriety in 1992 with her exhibition and third monograph ‘Immediate Family’. A cover article for the New York Times Magazine focussed on photographs Mann had taken of her children naked in the arcadian surroundings of the family farm. The author, Robert Woodward, claimed Mann had been told that “no fewer than eight pictures she had chosen for the traveling exhibition could subject her to arrest” for displaying indecent images. Her work was denounced as child pornography, often by people who had never seen it, and whilst the controversy made ‘Immediate Family’ a publishing sensation and Mann a celebrity, it was damaging to her reputation and brought with it much unwanted attention. 

Surprisingly perhaps further controversy did not ensue when Mann published ‘What Remains’ in 2003, a book which features photographs of decomposing corpses taken at the University of Tennessee’s Forensic Anthropology Facility, more generally known as the Body Farm. Regarding ‘What Remains’, Blake Morrison noted in the Guardian “her point being that death is not an end, that nature goes on doing its work long after the body has become a carapace. When her exhibition of that title opened in Washington in 2004, most reviewers got the point: "But not the woman in the New York Times, who freaked out and called the photos gross." Mann was surprised to see an art critic using the vocabulary of a 10-year-old, but not by the underlying prejudice: "There's a new prudery around death. We've moved it into hospital, behind screens, and no longer wear black markers to acknowledge its presence. It's become unmentionable."

In the introduction to her book Mann says that her ‘kids chalk up my “death thing” to genetics, blaming it, along with other things I do, on my father.” Robert S. Munger, her father, was a GP, who for four decades ‘labored over his great masterwork…exploring the iconography of death in art.’ He was, she says, ‘even for the time,..an uncommonly direct man. Not for him the euphemisms of death – it was a dead body, not “remains,” nobody “passed,” there was no “eternal rest.” People died and that was it.’ He died himself in 1988, suffering from cancer he committed suicide with an overdose of Seconal. His death ‘laid me flat for almost a year. Now, many deaths later, I am as perplexed by the experience as ever. Where did all of that him-ness go? All that knowledge, the accretion of experience from a remarkable life, the suffering – his and others’ – he had borne, the beauty, life’s own rapturous visions?” He died on the couch in the family living room and Mann took a famous picture of him post mortem, lying in his red robe, wild flowers laid on his chest and circling his wrists.    

‘What Remains’ is split into four sections; the first ‘Matter Lent’ begins with a quote from the 17th century French bishop Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

All things summon us to death: nature, almost envious of the good she has given us, tells us often and gives us notice that she cannot for long allow us that scrap of matter she has lent…she has need of it for other forms, she claims it back for other works.

In the pages that follow, Mann explores the physical processes by which the matter lent to us during our lives is returned to the natural world after our deaths. She draws us gently into the theme beginning with the decayed remains of her pet greyhound Eva, who died one Valentines Day and for whom Mann ‘wept noisily’. “And yet,” she says “I was still curious about what would finally become of that head I had stroked, oh, ten thousand times, those paws she so delicately crossed as she lay by my desk, rock hard nails emerging from the finest white hair.” So with the help of a friend, Mann buries her much loved Eva in a metal cage on the farm and a few weeks later disinters her to find “what looked like a stick drawing of a sleeping dog; her bones, punctuated by tufts of indigestible hair and small cubes of adipocere, appeared like a constellation in a rich black sky.” The first photos of Eva show her hide; presumably Mann’s friend, who ‘didn’t bat an eye’ at what she asked him to do, had skinned Eva for her, before helping to bury the greyhound. A series of Mann’s darkly sensuous images then show us the teeth, claws and bones of the dead dog. Then a quote from the poet Galway Kinnell (lamenting the barrenness of embalming and its prevention of decomposition) stands opposite a tenebrous landscape of leaves and grass in which a tiny sluglike old-fashioned shroud, tied neatly at both ends, shines luminously white. We are on the body farm. These are not documentary photographs but beautiful as they are, there is no attempt to disguise the subject matter. Bodies bloated with the post mortem gases produced by the corpses intestinal flora, skin split as it swells, skin being sloughed off, faces reduced to eyeless sockets and bared teeth. One photo shows a face apparently enveloped in mist; I thought it must be a spider’s web. In ‘Hold Still’ Mann reveals that the face was in fact a mass of writhing blow fly maggots (she provides a graphic colour image to confirm it), the gauzy film that veils it in the final black and white photograph was produced by a long exposure which reduced the motion of the insects to a fine blur.     

The section ‘December 8, 2000’ records the day a 19-year-old police fugitive broke onto the Mann family property. When cornered by the police he hid himself behind a tree within sight of the Mann’s house, put a gun to his head and pulled the trigger. Later Mann photographs the landscape where the suicide took place, the tracks left by the police cars in the meadow grass, the space around the tree where the body lay. “Death has left for me its imperishable mark on an ordinary copse of trees in the front yard,” Mann says, “But would a stranger, coming upon it a century hence, sense the sanctity of the death-inflected soil?” The next section, ‘Antietam’, answers that question. It is a series of landscape photos taken on the site of the Battle of Antietam, in Sharpsburg, Maryland where in 1862 the armies of Confederate General Robert E. Lee and Union General George B. McClellan, fought on the bloodiest day in American history, with 22,727 men dead, wounded or missing.  Mann’s photos, all apparently taken at night, may be darkly foreboding and dramatic but we know that this has everything to do with her artistic vision and little to do with the actual landscape. The final section ‘What Remains’ begins with a quote from Mann’s beloved Ezra Pound;

What thou lovest well remains
the rest is dross
What thou lov’t well shall not be
reft from thee 

It continues with 20 portraits of her children, cropped images of their faces. What remains is the love? It sounds trite but it isn’t, the series portraits grows more distorted with each shot, one is faded out except for a pair of lips, in others there are scratches and marks in the negatives, or the print is so dark the face resembles a skull with huge black sockets and the blanched skin looking like bone. What remains? Nothing. Love. Memory, The body. It all goes, it all ceases to exist.   

In 2015 Mann published a 570 page memoir called ‘Hold Still’ and last year Penguin reissued it in paperback as one of their Modern Classics series. There is plenty of stiff competition out there but this book is one of the best autobiographies I have ever read. Mann is as talented a writer as she is a photographer. She may not have moved very far from Lexington and even now spends most of her time at home but her life is fascinating from her feral childhood (her description) to her stately old age (she is now 74, though you wouldn’t guess it to see her). The book seems blisteringly honest; she does not shy away from or make excuses for her relatively privileged upbringing. There is a fascinating account of Gee-Gee, Virginia Carter, the black nanny who brought up Mann and her siblings and to whom she felt closer than to her own mother. Her portrait of Carter and the belated realisation of the difficulties a black woman living in Virginia would have faced are compulsive reading. As is her own and her husband’s family history (her mother-in-law murdered her husband and then committed suicide). This isn’t a straight forward memoir; some readers have felt short changed because they felt Mann doesn’t reveal enough of her personal life, others feel that she doesn’t focus enough on her work and others feel that the non-linear narrative is distracting. Despite all this it was a best seller in the US. I think it is a wonderful book, I love the meandering form, I love its willingness to grasp thorny issues, quite frankly I love everything about it. The woman is a genius and don’t let anyone tell you any different.  

The Tomb of General Ulysses S. Grant (1822-1885) Riverside Drive, New York

It was a freezing February visit to NYC; nighttime temperatures down to -8C and daytime only up to -1C in the sun, -10 with windchill taken into account. I wanted to visit Greenwood Cemetery in Brooklyn and I would happily have braved the subarctic weather conditions. But I could hardly expect the mother of my children to risk frostbite trailing around after me. We compromised and went to visit the tomb of General Ulysses S. Grant, 18th President of the United States, which was a short ride on the IRT up to 125th Street Station in Harlem (‘Up to Lexington, one-two-five’, the Velvet Underground playing in my head the whole way) and a 15-minute walk to Riverside Drive and Grant’s Mausoleum. To get inside you have to go to the General Grant National Memorial Visitor Centre across the road and ask one of the Park Rangers if they will let you in. There were only three us wanting to see the mausoleum on a bitterly cold midweek morning; the Ranger told us that we could only stay in there for 10 minutes for health and safety reasons, the temperature being so low. To be honest, out of the freezing wind the chilly mausoleum felt almost balmy.

The National Park Service leaflet about the mausoleum says that Grant was “a plain-spoken unassuming man who studiously avoided pomp and ceremony.” It is ironic then that the nation decided to honour him by entombing him in a mausoleum of a grandeur usually considered more appropriate for the last resting places of Emperors, Kings and Pharaohs. General Grant, who was born in Ohio, is credited with winning the Civil War for the Union after struggling to get himself recruited at a suitable rank in the early stages of the conflict. Lincoln eventually promoted him to Lieutenant General after his victory at Chatanooga and he defeated the confederate General Robert E. Lee after a 13-month campaign at the battle of Appomattox. He fell out with Lincoln’s unpopular successor, Andrew Johnson, and became the Republican candidate for the Presidency in 1868. Reconstructing and reuniting the war-ravaged US was an even bigger job than winning the war and Grant struggled with what was an almost impossible task but is now generally considered to have done a creditable job under difficult circumstances. He won re-election to the Presidency in 1872 in a landslide victory but his second term was a struggle and he stood aside for the 1876 election. In 1877 he commenced a two-year world tour, starting in England before moving onto Europe, then India and the rest of Asia, before travelling back to the US via Hawaii. In England he was the guest of the Prince of Wales at Epsom races (where he also met the Duke of Wellington) and he had breakfast with Matthew Arnold, Anthony Trollope and Robert Browning. He was received by Queen Victoria at Windsor, though there were issues about protocol as no one knew how to treat an Ex-president (the then prime minister Benjamin Disraeli thought that he was just a ‘commoner’) and his son Jesse, much to his disgust, was seated at the official banquet with the Royal servants.    

His later years were overshadowed by financial worries. With an income of only $6000 dollars a year and no presidential pension, Grant felt obliged to involve himself in business speculations starting with the ill fated Mexican Southern railroad which went bankrupt in 1884. He then invested $100,000 dollars in his son’s Wall Street brokerage firm, not realising that his son’s partner, a man called Ferdinand Ward, was essentially running a Ponzi scheme. When the scheme eventually crashed Grant not only lost all his money, he found himself in personal debt of $150,000 to William Henry Vanderbilt from whom he had borrowed the money, at Ward’s insistence, to try and save the floundering firm. Vanderbilt offered to forget the debt but Grant refused and repaid all the money by signing over his house to the multi-millionaire and selling off most of his personal possessions. His integrity was heroic; he already knew that he was suffering from the throat cancer that would kill him the following year. Desperate for cash to try and secure the finances of his soon to be widow Julia, Grant began writing articles on his civil war campaigns for The Century Magazine at $500 a time.  These were so well received that he accepted an offer for a book from the magazine to write his memoirs with a 10% royalty. At this point his friend Mark Twain stepped in and made him an alternative offer for the memoir, with a royalty of 70%.  Grant spent his last months writing his memoirs, completing them on 18 July 1885, just five days before he died on July 23rd. 

News of General Grant’s death was widely reported in the British and Colonial press. One of the first full reports came in the Colonial Standard and Jamaica Despatch published in Kingston on the first of August and drawing heavily on a report in the New York Herald which gave extensive details of the General’s dying moments;       

Death of General Ulysses Grant.

THE TWICE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

The "New York Herald," of the 24th July announces the death of General Grant; which took place after nine months of suffering, from cancer on the tongue, at Mount McGregor shortly after eight o'clock on the morning of the preceding day. From scenes at his death bed published in the "Herald," we take the following pathetic example;

The wife almost constantly stroked the forehead and hands of the dying General, and at times, as the passionate longing to prevent the event so near would rise within her, Mrs. Grant pressed both his hands, and, leaning forward, tenderly kissed the face of the sinking man, colonel Fred Grant sat silently, but with evident feeling, though his bearing was that of a soldier at the death-bed of a hero father. U. S. Grant, Jr., was deeply moved, but Jessie bore the scene steadily, and the ladies, while watching with wet cheeks. were silent as befitted the dignity of a life such as was closing before them. The morning had passed five minutes beyond 8 o'clock and there was not one of the strained and waiting watchers but who could mark the nearness of the life tide to its final ebbing. Dr. Douglas noted the nearness of the supreme moment and quietly approached the bedside and bent above it, and while he did so the sorrow of the grey haired physician seemed closely allied with that of the family. Dr Shrady also drew near. It was seven minutes after eight o'clock and the eyes of the General were closing.

His breathing grew more hushed as the last functions of the heart and lungs were hastened to the closing of the Ex-President's life. A peaceful expression seemed to be deepening in the firm and strong lined face, and it was reflected as a closing comfort in the sad hearts that beat quickly under the stress of loving suspense. A minute more passed as the General drew a deeper breath. There was an exhalation like that of one relieved of long and anxious tension. The members of the group were impelled each a step nearer the bed, and each awaited another respiration, but it never came. There was absolute stillness in the room, and a hush of expectant suspense, and no sound broke the silence save the singing of the birds in the pines outside the cottage and the measured throbbing of the engine that all night had waited by the little mountain depot down the slope. “It is all over," quietly spoke Dr. Douglas and there came then heavily to each witness the realization that General Grant was dead.

Then the doctors withdrew, the nurse closed down the eyelids and composed the dead General's head, after which each of the family group pressed to the bedside, one after the other, and touched their lips upon the quiet face so lately stilled.

From the Aberdeen Press and Journal - Tuesday 01 June 1897

Over a decade later the British press followed with interest the building of the General’s mausoleum. This is from the Saffron Walden Weekly News of Friday 09 April 1897;

GENERAL GRANT'S TOMB. The inauguration of the Grant Mausoleum in New York on April 27th promises be one of the most impressive ceremonies ever witnessed in the United States. When General Grant died there was universal desire among his countrymen that his services should be marked in some striking manner, and so long ago 1885 a, committee began to collect funds and inspect designs. The site selected is at Riverside Park, on the banks of the river Hudson, near New York city. For some years the project met with only moderate financial success, but in 1892 there was a great revival of popular feeling in New York city, and in single month £40.000 was subscribed.

Altogether the monument will cost £120,000. It consists of a granite structure 90 feet square. This runs to height of 70ft. and then is surmounted circular cupola 70ft. in diameter which has a pyramidical top. The summit is 150ft. from the base, and as the site selected is 130ft. above the waters of the Hudson, it will form a conspicuous landmark for many miles.

The interior is cruciform, ornamented with sculptures illustrating the life and death of General Grant. These are the work of an American sculptor, Mr J. Massey Rhind. The sarcophagus is porphyry, and the pedestal of dark bluish grey granite. All the exposed faces of the sarcophagus are highly polished, the finish being so smooth that the surfaces are like mirror, reflecting whatever objects are close at hand. The pedestal is square in plan, measuring ten feet ten inches each way. The lower course is made in pieces, with a simple moulding, and is one foot eight inches thick. Above this is a five inch course, also made in pieces. Under this rest two large blocks, ten feet long and five feet wide, and on these rest the pillow blocks, which support the sarcophagus proper and its cover. The total height above the floor the crypt will be seven and half feet. The space inside is large enough to contain the metallic casket of highly-polished copper inside the cedar coffin. The casket of Bessemer steel which now encloses the coffin will be dispensed with, as it is no longer needed, its place being taken by the stone sarcophagus, with I its heavy cover. The only inscription the sarcophagus is: “Ulysses S. Grant.”

The Exeter & Plymouth Gazette of 22 April 1897 focussed on the details of the General’s sarcophagus;

The sarcophagus, in which the remains of Ulysses S. Grant will be placed on the 27th inst. on the Riverside Drive, New York City, is a huge block of granite quarried at Montello, Wisconsin. When uncut, this stone is as being of “a pinkish chocolate colour dashed with specks of black and white,” and when polished, “it becomes indescribably beautiful, the pale pink taking a rich red lustre, and the fine hard grain reflects like a mirror.” The sarcophagus weighs 10 tons. Its dimensions are 10 feet 4 inches long, 5 feet 6 inches wide, and 4 feet 8 inches long. The lid is of marble.  The sarcophagus is supported by two pillar blocks of granite resting on a slab of granite from Massachusetts, the grey of which contrasts admirably with the rich red tone of the sarcophagus. The inscription, with eloquent simplicity, consists only of the name, arranged in three lines, “Ulysses S. Grant.”

And finally, from the Evening News of Wednesday 28 April 1897 details, supplied almost instantly by Reuters via the latest technology of telegraphy, of the inauguration ceremony held the previous day in New York;  

(Reuter’s Cablegram) New York, April 27.—The monument to General Grant which has been erected by private subscription on the Riverside Drive, overlooking the Hudson, was dedicated to-day, in presence of President M‘Kinley,  ex-President Cleveland, the high officers of the nation and of the various States, the members of the Diplomatic Corps, the survivors of General Grant’s family, including Mrs Sertous and children, and a vast concourse of spectators.

The dedication was marked by splendid pageant on land and water. The weather was favourable on the whole. Lying off the promontory were the American and foreign warships participating in the ceremonies, All were decked with flags and fired salutes in the morning. In the course of the forenoon the sons of Confederate veterans laid a wreath (with crossed swords) on the tomb.

Shortly after nine o'clock President M’Kinley and Mr Hobart, Mrs. Grant, and family, and the official guests, accompanied by an escort, preceded to the monument.   The members of the diplomatic corps, headed by Sir Juliam Pauncefote were also warmly greeted as they passed along. The ceremonies began at half-pest eleven with a brief religious service.

President M‘Kinley then delivered a short address. General Grant, he said, loved peace and told the world that honourable arbitration was the best hope of civilisation. Mr. Horace Porter transferred the monument to the sale-keeping of the city. The march past of troops followed. In this there participated nearly 6000 regular troops, seamen, and marines. The troops were everywhere received with ringing cheers.  They were subsequently received by Mr M’Kinley.

The President afterwards went on board the Dolphin and reviewed the fleet. The city was gaily beflagged and decorated, a feature in the decorative scheme being portraits of General Grant, on which were inscribed his words, ‘Let’s have peace.’

In the evening there was a largely attended reception of foreign and naval officers at Waldorf House. Her majesty’s ship Talbot had a leading place in the foreign line of the international fleet.

General Grant accepts the surrender of General Robert E. Lee

Scenes of Clerical Life; the remarkable story of the Rev. Basil Claude Hudson Andrews (1867-1963? final resting place unknown)

 

This kindly looking old cove is the Reverend Basil Andrews, for forty years the chaplain at Kensal Green Cemetery. The most famous funeral service he conducted, certainly the one he remembered in later life, was for Winston Churchill’s two-year-old daughter Marigold in August 1921. A grief-stricken Churchill asked the assembled press photographers not to take pictures and it is always said that they quietly left without taking any shots of the private funeral. But researching the life of Reverend Andrews I came across a grainy photo on the front page of the Daily Mirror for Saturday 27 August 1921 which shows a clergyman, it must be him, conducting the final part of the service in front of an open grave. Churchill stands with stooped shoulders, supporting himself with a walking stick, by Andrews’ side.  A large crowd of mourners is gathered on the far side of the grave; it seems to have been a very public ‘private’ funeral for the two-year-old. Thirty years later a disgraced Andrews was recalling the funeral for the benefit of a journalist, from the Sunday Dispatch, whose distrust of the cleric’s uncorroborated word was so great that he felt obliged to go and check the story in newspaper files. The Reverend Basil Andrews was, it has to be said, not a man to be trusted.

Basil Claude Hudson Andrews was born at the vicarage of St Luke's, Kentish Town in 1867. His father Charles was the vicar of St Luke's and Basil was the youngest of seven children. He was educated privately at St Edward’s School Oxford and, for reasons which were almost certainly nothing to do with religious conviction, he decided to follow in his father’s footsteps and become ordained as a clergyman in the Church of England.  At the age of 24 he became a missionary in South Africa, where he spent four years before moving on to take up a clerical position in Toronto. In Canada he made his first marriage, to Annie Maud Rackham in December 1895. The couple had two children, a son Arthur who was born in 1897 and a daughter Naomi who was born in January 1901 but died just a month later (Arthur was also to die young, in 1922 at the age of 25). The marriage evidently did not go well because a couple of years later Basil returned to England apparently abandoning his wife and young son in Canada. He then spent three years as a curate at the parish of St Leonards, in Watlington, Oxfordshire before his tenure ended in mysterious circumstances. In 1907 he became the chaplain at Kensal Green cemetery, a job he remained in for the next forty years. 

The 1911 census shows the 43-year-old Basil living at Flat 5, 89 Elgin Crescent with his 27-year-old ‘wife’, Emma Louise Andrews. In truth Basil and Emma were, ironically, living together without benefit of clergy. Basil was, after all, still married to Annie in Canada. At the same time he also seems to have been carrying on a relationship with a woman called Alice Clark as she gave birth to a son in Hackney in 1913 and Basil is the registered father. Despite this his relationship with Emma seems to have been a serious one; they were certainly still masquerading as man and wife on the 1921 census, though she may not have known about his amorous adventures in Hackney. Basil could have made an honest woman of Emma as his first wife died in March 1921. He may have been able to marry her even earlier; Annie remarried in 1915, either because she and Basil had divorced or because she thought she could get away with bigamy. In any case Basil was free to remarry by 1921 at the latest but there is no record of a marriage ever taking place.  Electoral records show Emma as living at Elgin Avenue with Basil until 1931; she then disappears from the record, untraceable now because Andrews was never her real name.

Financial difficulties as well as Basil’s reluctance to pop the question were probably the cause of the breakdown of his relationship with Emma. By 1925 Basil was bankrupt, owing £6500 to his creditors and having only £300 in assets. Although he wasn’t admitting it to anyone, Basil was a gambler and a spendthrift. To the court he claimed that he had only got into financial difficulties trying to help out an unnamed friend. This is from the Kensington Post of 09 January 1925;

A CHAPLAIN’S GUARANTEE, At Bankruptcy Buildings, Carey Street, the first meeting was held of the creditors under a receiving order made against Basil Claude Hudson Andrews, clerk in Holy Orders, whose address was given as Elgin Avenue. The receiving order was made on the debtor’s own petition. From the statement made by Mr. Walter Boyle, Senior Official Receiver, it appeared that the debtor estimated his liabilities at £6,500, and his assets at £300, apart from a claim of against a friend, who was an undischarged bankrupt. The debtor was ordained in 1890. He had taken duty in South Africa and in Canada, and from 1906 until 1908, when he was appointed chaplain at Kensal Green, he acted as organising secretary for the Church of England Waifs and Strays Society for the dioceses of Oxford and Peterborough. He became guarantor for his friend, who had borrowed £500 from a moneylender, and to meet his guarantee he had himself been forced to obtain loans. In the hope that his friend might repay him, he had borrowed from moneylenders. He attributed his insolvency to the high interest he had to pay. It was decided that the estate should remain in the hands of the Official Receiver.

In 1932 Basil married again, this time a wealthy widow, Edith Isabella Henderson.  Edith, and her money, seem to have kept Basil out of trouble for the next 20 years. He retired from Kensal Green in 1947 and the couple carried on living quietly in the Elgin Crescent flat until Edith died in 1952. Following her death the 85-year-old Basil found himself gradually slipping into a way of life that would eventually make him, temporarily at least, the most famous, and notorious, clergyman in England. Quite what happened we do not know but by 1955 Basil was apparently almost destitute, no longer living at Elgin Crescent, hanging around the Cumberland Hotel in Bayswater, helping himself to continental breakfasts and whatever else he could cadge from the staff or guests, betting heavily on the horses and asking for favours from the other shady characters who used the hotel as a base for their shady activities. 

Jack 'Spot' Comer and his wife Margaret (Rita Molloy) after his acquittal on stabbing charges  

In the hot afternoon of Thursday 11 August 1955 an argument between two middle-aged men broke out outside the Bar Italia on Frith Street in Soho. The argument quickly turned violent and both men pulled out blades. The two combatants were 43-year-old Jacob Colmore aka Jack Comer or Jack Spot and the slightly younger and taller George Arthur Albert Dimeo aka Albert Dimes or Italian Al. The fight, in which both men were seriously injured, was the climax of a long running power struggle between Jewish gangland boss Jack Spot and his one-time protegee Billy Hill. Hill encouraged Dimes to refuse to pay protection money to Spot and the result was the fracas outside the Bar Italia. That no one was killed in the fight is generally credited to Mrs Stone Hyams. the 13 stone wife of a Frith Street greengrocer, who laid about both men with a cast iron frying pan. When Spot found himself in court charged with stabbing Dimes a key witness was the Reverend Basil Andrews who had apparently witnessed the fight from the other side of Frith Street and quite clearly seen Dimes pull his weapon first and inflict the first wound. The jury drew the conclusion that Spot had acted in self defence and he was acquitted.  The Reverends performance in the witness box may have convinced the jury but the police and perhaps more crucially, the press, were not fooled. The police were chary of questioning 88-year-old clergymen on whether he had perjured himself in the witness box but the press had no compunctions. Basil found himself besieged in his rented room by Fleet Street’s finest.

“When I was living in Inverness-terrace,” he later recalled, “I was bombarded by these beastly reporters who have no decency in them and who do nothing but bully and nag and treat you abominably. They came upstairs while I was in bed and when I opened the door, they put their foot in the door and treated me disgracefully. It is a disgrace for the Press to treat a man like at. I believe a reporter of the Daily Telegraph came to my room and he happened to be an extremely nice man. I do not know his name. He asked me lots of questions about my life. He said: ‘Of course, in the future, at some time or other, if you tell us a story it might be worth your while,’ something to that effect.” Garrulous Basil ended up confiding in the nice man from the Daily Telegraph, the newspaper published, the police questioned Basil and by December Spot’s 27-year-old Mrs. Margaret Comer, of Hyde Park Mansions, Marylebone; Peter MacDonough, 45, of Upper Berkeley-street, Mayfair; Morris Goldstein, 43, of Gore - road, Hackney, and Bernard Schack, 53, of Maple-place, Stepney found themselves behind the dock accused of conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice. Basil was the main prosecution witness. According to the daily Express he “said in a pulpit-loud voice at Bow-street court yesterday: “The evidence I gave at the Old Bailey trial of Jack Comer was all lies. I never saw the fight I described; I was not even there. I got £64 for the lies I told.” Under questioning from the prosecution barrister and the 3 counsels for defence he told the court that he had been first approached by McDonough in the Cumberland Hotel, then met Goldstein and Schack before been driven by car next day “to a flat in Hyde Park Mansions from Inverness-terrace, Bayswater, where I was living. At Hyde Park Mansions we went to a flat on the fifth floor. I was shown into a very nicely furnished sitting-room with large armchairs and was introduced to Mrs. Comer. She was extremely nice and offered me a cup of tea. She was very friendly and pleased to see me. I think she expressed herself as being so thankful that I was going to help them. She was in a terrible state of anxiety about her husband. I felt extremely sorry for her. At the end of my first visit to the flat Mrs. Comer gave me a £1 note. . .  I am not positive whether it was £1 or 10s. to pay for a taxi.” Basil was taken to Frith Street to fix the topography of the knife fight in his head, and comprehensively rehearsed in his story before been taken to see Spot’s solicitor to make a statement. The jury found all four defendants guilty. Margaret Comer was fined £50 but the three men were all given jail sentences, McDonough and Schack 12 months and Goldstein two years.

A few months after his wife's conviction for conspiracy, Jack and Rita were attacked by a gang of Billy Hill's enforcers, including Mad Frankie Fraser. In this famous photo Jack shows off his injuries from the attack

The perjuring parson had found himself an unexpected celebrity following the initial trial. The newspapers were keen to find out more about him and contrary to what he told the court in the conspiracy case, it wasn’t just the Daily Telegraph he had spoken to.  Even when he did refuse to speak to journalists some old acquaintances were not so reluctant, turning out to be blabbermouths who could just not stop themselves talking once a reporter flipped open his notebook and asked them a question or two.  This is from the Daily Herald of 26 September 1955;

In the past two years Mr. Andrews appears to have abandoned the settled life which he had hitherto led. For about 40 years he lived at a flat in Elgin-avenue, Maida Vale—first with his wife and later, after she died, alone. Since leaving there two years ago he has had a number of addresses. Mrs. Gertrude Vizard, caretaker of the Elgin-avenue flats, remembers him. "He had many friends at Oxford," she said last night, "and was often visited by a woman from Oxford who had a young daughter. He was a kind and quiet gentleman, but never had much money. I once lent him £8 to settle an income tax demand but he paid me back." The Rev. Basil Andrews had appointments in Canada until came this country in 1901 and became curate at St. Peter's, Eaton-square, S.W. Then for 40 years he was chaplain at Kensal Green Cemetery until he retired in 1947. In the last few years has worked the tough streets of Soho among criminals and girls who have "gone astray."

Even more damaging was the story in the Sunday Dispatch on the 2nd of October 1955 which appeared under the headlines ‘From diamond fields to the West End stage, the strange life of the ‘Jack Spot’ parson, Women travelled miles to hear him preach’;

"The parson with the silver voice." That is how the people of Watlington, Oxfordshire, remember the Rev. Basil Andrews, key witness in the sensational Jack ("Spot") Comer case. Older parishioners recall the tall, dark, wavy-haired curate whose brilliant preaching filled the church 45 years ago. They remember that many women came from miles around to hear him. For three years they thronged to listen to the "dapper" curate. Then Mr. Andrews went as suddenly as he came. "He disappeared from the White House at Church Close with his smartly dressed wife and son one week-end," Mr. Harold Searly, 70-year-old clothier, told me, "In a way we were sorry to him go. We will never forget his three years at St. Luke's Parish Church." Mr. Surly said It was understood that Mr. Andrews left because women parishioners were paying him too much attention. "I was always in the congregation," Mr. Searly added. "So were my sisters. He was so interesting. He helped the church no end. He was a vigorous worker and looked after the choir. Two years ago he came back to our village. I hardly recognised him. He told me he was retired and wanted to meet old friends."

Mr. F. Storer, of the Mill House. Cooksham-road, Watlington, told me: "He stayed here sometimes with my mother and father. He was a great friend of the family. I know of no relationship between us, though my sister, Mrs. Sybil Owen. of Eastleigh, Southend, Garsington, Oxford, has been described as his niece. I saw him about four years ago. He came here with Sybil and I drove him around. My mother knew him before she married my father, who was organist at St. Luke's Church.” Friends of Mr. Arthur Owen, Sybil's husband, told me: "Mrs. Owen has been away for three years. She returned Just over a week ago. I was surprised to see that she has become a blonde after three years away."

Later. Mr. Andrews became minister at All Souls Church of England Chapel in Kensal Green Cemetery. He had a flat in Elgin Avenue, W. In the past ten years he was a fairly frequent visitor to a public house at Kensal Green. He would go in, drink five pints of beer and have a set lunch. It was not unusual for him to leave a half a crown tip. In the neighbourhood people told me: " He used to buy a midday racing paper. He telephoned his bets. Sometimes his language was unclerical."

In Soho Mr. Andrews was also well known. "In the years I've known him he always liked a gamble," a friend said. The silver tongue of the whitehaired. bent-shouldered Rev. Basil Claude Andrews has not deserted him in his 89th year. He tells how, at the age of 23, he went to South Africa as a missionary. He shook hands with Cecil Rhodes within 60 minutes of disembarking at Cape Town. But for his wanderlust, he says, he could have been a bishop in Toronto, Canada. After three years In South Africa. and wandering round the diamond fields of Kimberley, meeting and drinking with "some of the worst scoundrels in the world," Andrews sailed for Canada. There. in Toronto he became secretary to the bishop and priest-vicar at the cathedral. Mr. Andrews's next recollection takes him to London's West End and he believes the Lyric Theatre. There he had tea on the stage with actress Marie Löhr while the curtain was down between acts. Another experience he tells about was reading the burial service at Kensal Green Cemetery over the child of Winston Churchill. who was then Colonial Secretary. (This service—on two-year-old Marigold Frances Churchill — has been verified in newspaper files). Not long ago. Mr. Andrews says. he went for help--because he was hard up—to the Rt. Rev. Cyril Eastaugh, Bishop of Kensington. "But." says Mr. Andrews. his thin lips tightening, "the bishop was most unsympathetic. He despises me because I have borrowed money and not pad it back, and in particular, borrowed it from members of the Church."

After the trial, and rather unusually or an 88-year-old man, the Reverend Basil disappears from the official record. Given that he was 88 he can’t have lived for very much longer but there is no trace of a death record for Basil Andrews in the UK, in Ireland or abroad. Did embarrassed relatives spirit him away? Quite possibly; there are rumours that he died in 1963, though no records are available to back this up. The rumours originate from Australia; his son with Annie Clark moved to New Zealand in the 1920’s. Perhaps Basil spent his final years living down under, living under an assumed name.

His death isn’t the only mystery still unsolved from Basil’s colourful life. James Morton in an article for the Law Society mentions in passing that Basil lived for 20 years with a woman called Ruby Young. Coincidentally Ruby was also someone who achieved national notoriety as a result of appearing as a witness in a court case. Her 15 minutes of fame had come in 1907 when she gave evidence in the trial of Robert Wood who was accused of murdering Phylis Dimmock, a prostitute, in Camden Town. Phylis had been found at her lodgings with her throat cut clutching a postcard of a rising sun. A photograph of a postcard was printed in the papers and Wood, an artist, came forward to admit not only that the drawing was his but that he had known Phylis. Wood also persuaded Ruby Young, an old girlfriend of his, to give him an alibi for the night of the murder, but she later changed her mind and went to a journalist and the police with the story. Ruby was called as a prosecution witness and she suddenly found herself famous. It had become clear in the course of her evidence that she had had an intimate relationship with Wood, and she was attractive and not averse to posing for newspaper photographers. This did not go down well with the jury who seemed to believe the defence’s suggestion that Ruby had made the whole thing up to get the £100 reward offered by The News of the World for anyone able to identify the handwriting on the rising sun postcard. Wood was found not guilty. If Morton is correct when would Ruby Young have lived with Basil? We know that Basil did live with a woman for more than 20 years; the woman who on the 1911 and 1921 census and the electoral roll is named as Emma Louisa Andrew. Are Ruby and Emma the same person living under different names? 

Is this Emma Louisa Young?