Was
George Hill as dull as his epitaph suggests? It is not unusual for memorial
inscriptions to mention the grave occupant’s occupation but very few are as
exclusively focused on career achievements as George’s. “For upwards of 30
years the deceased was an esteemed and valued member of the local civil service
in the Bengal residency,” it says. This about as much as we would normally
want to know about George’s life in the Colonial Civil Service but he wants us
to also know that the Government of India, no less, “were pleased in several
dispatches to the court of directors to bear testimony to his public worth.”
Very good, lets move on. “He was, moreover, for many years secretary to the
retiring fund established by the medical officers of the Bengal Army.” Very
interesting George, how about your family? “And during his incumbency he so materially
enhanced and consolidated the permanent interests of that institution…” - did
you have a wife, George? Children? - “that his resignation was the subject
of general regret…” I don’t think so George. I bet they couldn’t wait to
see the back of you, you old bore. We get his dates; born 20th October 1802,
died 24th August 1864 and, in the first snippet of any interest, his place of
death; ‘the Palace Hotel, Buckingham Gate, SW.’ but otherwise George’s
summation of his life is a tedious recital of his CV, as though he was applying
for a middle management position in Paradise.
Although
he doesn’t mention him George’s son is also buried here, George Hill Junior,
his ‘second son’ according to his epitaph on a side panel of the memorial, who
apparently followed his father into the Bengal Civil Service before becoming
the Senior Lieutenant in the 1st [West] Norfolk Regiment of Militia before
“seriously impaired sight compelled him very early in life to relinquish public
employment.” Although he deliberately chose not to mention it, George Hill
senior was in fact married twice, the first time tragically, the second time
scandalously, and was the father of 9 children. Traumatised, particularly by
his second wife, at the end of his life an embittered George apparently preferred
to dwell on the meagre satisfactions of his career rather than recall a
troubling and chaotic domestic life.
Despite
my best efforts I have not been able to find out anything about George Hill’s
origins. I have not been able to trace a birth record in either the UK or
India. In 1828 he was initiated as a Freemason in the Aurora Lodge, Candour and
Cordiality in Calcutta. His profession was listed as merchant. Two years later when
the Aurora Lodge merged with the Lodge of True Friendship, George had embarked
on his civil service career and gave his profession as General Treasury. He was
already a married man at the time of his initiation into the Masons having
married Evelina Virginia Howe at St John’s church (then a cathedral) on 10 May
1827; the groom was 25 at the time of the marriage, the bride 22. Evelina was
already a third generation Anglo-Indian; her paternal grandfather had been born
in Nottingham and moved to India to serve in the Bengal presidency army. In
India he lived for 10 years with an Irish woman called Margaret Shaw and had
three illegitimate children with her including Evelina’s father, before he
married her in 1786. He had two more children with Margaret and then oddly,
married her for a second time in 1806. Evelina’s own family was large and thoroughly
Anglo-Indian family; both her her parents had been born in Calcutta and she had
8 brothers and sisters. Evelina and George wasted no time in starting their own
family; they were married in May, Evelina became pregnant in June and their
first child, Mary Letitia was born on Match 17th the following year. Tragically
she only lived 4 months and 21 days, dying on the 8th August 1828. Initially Evelina
produced babies almost at the rate of one a year, after Mary Letitia in 1828
came eldest son Stuart, born in 1829, and George junior in 1830 and daughter
Theodosia in 1831. Theodosia died before she was three, in 1834. There were
three more surviving children, John Alexander in 1835, Latitia in 1836 and
Octavious William in 1838 though John Alexander died in 1839 when he was four. In
November 1841 Evelina gave birth to a still born girl and on the 5th January
1844 her eleventh and final child, a boy, was also still born. Evelina died
herself six days later of a post-partum infection, worn out by childbearing and
heartache no doubt. Unlike George’s dry epitaph, the epitaph on Evelina’s
headstone in South Park Street Cemetery in Kolkata is heartbreaking.
|
Evelina Hill's epitaph on her memorial in the South Park Street burial ground in Calcutta (from 'The Bengal Obituary; A compilation of tablets and monumental inscriptions from various parts of the Bengal and Agra presidencies' W. Thacker & Co London 1851) |
According
to Evelina’s epitaph her 6 surviving children were all in England whilst George,
now 42 years old, remained alone in Calcutta. But not for long; he soon met another
Anglo-Indian, a 21-year-old woman called Anna Maria Lyster, the daughter of “a
distinguished officer in the Bengal Artillery” Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Hawtrey.
Young as she was Anna Maria was already widow with a two-year-old daughter. The
young widow was immensely attractive but penniless and in need of a protector. George was older, his children were far away
in England and he ‘held a lucrative appointment, as head assistant to the
Military Board of the Accountant General's Office’. He was not the most
exciting catch but he offered stability. The couple were married at St Johns on
16th January 1847, the groom 20 years older than the bride. According to an
account of Anna Maria’s divorce petition in the London Evening Standard of Friday
22 July 1864 “the union, from an early period, was a very unhappy one.” Anna
Maria had secrets, which she claimed to have divulged to George on the eve of their
wedding; the groom “said he would take a day to consider before he decided but
he then agreed to marry her notwithstanding what had occurred.” This the
Evening Standard’s version of what Anna Maria told George;
It
appeared that Colonel Hawtrey died several years ago, leaving a widow, a son,
who was in the Indian army, and the petitioner and another daughter. After his
decease the widow, who was left in limited circumstances, came to England with
her daughters, and while staying at Margate formed the acquaintance of a
Colonel Lyster, to whom the petitioner, then almost a child, was married in
1847, and by whom she had a daughter, which is still living. It was discovered
that Colonel Lyster, who is dead, had a wife at the time he contracted this
marriage.
According
to her, Anna Maria’s marriage had been contracted ‘in a room’ in Wales and
unsurprisingly no official record of it exists. She continued to live with
Colonel Lyster until his death in 1846 when she returned to India.
George
“was of a jealous and suspicious character, and frequent altercations took
place between him and” Anna Mara according to the Newspaper but despite this Anna
Maria bore him two children, a boy named George after his father and a daughter
Alice. The rift between the couple became open when George decided to return to
England with his young family:
Sometime
after the marriage they left India for England, but in consequence of
differences on the voyage the petitioner refused to accompany her husband
further than Mauritius, where she remained for some time, but ultimately
returned to England and took up her residence with her friends. It was at the
period of this rupture between the parties that the first adultery was alleged
to have taken place with a Lieutenant Hickey. Sometime after her return to England
she was induced by the respondent to resume cohabitation with him, and they
continued to live together until 1857. In that year she accompanied him to
Folkestone, on his way to Germany, when he told her that he had altered his
mind about taking her with him abroad, and desired her to go with the children
to Sandgate, and remain there until he returned in about a week or fortnight.
While she was staying there he addressed a most offensive letter to a policeman
in that neighbourhood, asking to be informed how she conducted herself since
his departure. On her return to England he agreed to allow her £100. a year,
but refused to live with her, but the allowance was sometimes not paid in full.
Anna
Maria petitioned for a divorce on the grounds that George had deserted her and
that he was not paying alimony as previously agreed. George contested the
divorce and the case was heard, in front of a jury, at Westminster by Judge Sir
James Wilde. George’s case was that he had not deserted Anna Maria but had separated
from her because of her unreasonable behaviour. She had, he claimed, been unfaithful
to him with two different men; she had committed adultery with Lieutenant Hickey on board the steam ship Argo on the
voyage between Calcutta and Mauritius, and in England she had conducted a ‘clandestine
intimacy’ with a Mr Edward Warwick, an unmarried man, at his chambers in Regent
Street and ‘at diverse other places’. In George’s version of events after separating
at Mauritius Anna Maria had followed him to London and begged him to take her
back, saying that she was not guilty of infidelity as George thought. George
took her back but then “not withstanding his kindness” Anna Maria was treated
him with “insolence and neglect, exhibited towards him great violence of temper
and on some occasions violently assaulted him, pulled his hair and threw divers
missiles at him.” She also frequently absented herself from home and refused to
say where she had been. The petition also includes a copy of an incriminating letter
from Lieutenant Hickey addressed to ‘My own darling’. George claimed that when
the Argo arrived in Mauritius Anna Maria went with Hickey to a hotel for the
day and never returned to the ship leaving him to travel on alone with their daughter.
According to the Evening Standard after
listening to all this “the learned judge said that there was no chance of these
parties living together, and suggested that a private arrangement should be
made between them which would render the scandal of further proceedings unnecessary.
The counsel then retired, and after about an hour's absence an arrangement was
made and the proceedings terminated.”
One
can only imagine the toll these humiliating court proceedings took on George
and Anna Maria. It must have been bad enough in court in front of the judge and
jury but then to see lurid details printed in the newspapers in the following
days. Anna Maria strikes one as being the more robust character. She lived
until 1897, surviving not only her husband but her son and daughter. George on
the other hand didn’t live more than another month, dying of a seizure in his
hotel room at the Palace Hotel in Buckingham Gate.
|
The Palace Hotel, Westminster where George died in 1864. |